Our own product
Writford
A workspace for UK legal firms connecting cited research, matter records, time recording and billing. The research workflow keeps source checking and professional review with the solicitor.
Explore WritfordManchester software house. We build websites, web and mobile apps, MVPs and AI for UK businesses.
More buyers now start with an assistant instead of a search box, and it names two or three firms rather than ten blue links. We find out what ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Copilot currently say about your business, then fix the reasons you are not being named. Manchester based, working across the UK.
Ranking on Google and being named by an assistant are different problems. A page can sit on the first page of search and still never be quoted, usually for one of these four reasons.
An assistant can only cite a page it can fetch, parse and quote. We fix the things that quietly prevent that — blocked crawlers, content that only exists after a script runs, pages with no clear answer to quote.
Assistants quote the sentence that answers the question. We rewrite your pages so the answer comes first and the supporting detail follows, which is also how a buyer in a hurry reads.
Schema markup that states plainly what you sell, where you work and how to contact you, so an assistant does not have to infer it from your homepage and get it wrong.
Assistants lean on a small set of directories, industry bodies and reference sites. We get your details onto the ones that matter for your sector, and make sure they agree with each other.
Each assistant retrieves and cites sources differently. We optimise for all of them at once, because a buyer asking for a recommendation rarely tells you which one they used.
Cites pages it can retrieve and quote directly. Answer-first content and clean structure win the citation.
Draws on the same index as classic search, so technical health and schema still decide whether you appear.
Shows its sources openly. Pages that answer one question completely get cited and clicked.
Draws on the Bing index, which many UK businesses never verify in Bing Webmaster Tools, and reaches business users through Office. Clearly structured, factual pages with the claim and the evidence close together do best.
Consistent business facts across the sources assistants trust, so your name, services and location never conflict.
How each assistant weighs sources is not published, so parts of this are informed inference from testing rather than documented behaviour. We test your visibility with real prompts every month and report what actually changed.
Each assistant company runs more than one crawler, and they do different jobs. Blocking the one that trains a model is a reasonable choice; blocking the one that decides whether you can be cited is usually an accident. This is what each company documents.
| Crawler | What it is for | If you block it |
|---|---|---|
| OAI-SearchBot | OpenAI’s crawler for surfacing pages in ChatGPT search. | Your pages cannot be shown or cited in ChatGPT search results. |
| GPTBot | OpenAI’s crawler for collecting training data. OpenAI treats it as independent of OAI-SearchBot. | Your content is excluded from training. It does not stop ChatGPT search citing you, if OAI-SearchBot is allowed. |
| Googlebot | Google Search’s crawler. Google says AI Overviews and AI Mode need nothing extra: a page must be indexed and eligible to show with a snippet. | You drop out of Google Search, and with it AI Overviews and AI Mode. |
| Google-Extended | A control for whether content helps train and ground Google’s other AI products, not a separate crawler for Search. | No effect on appearing in Google Search or its AI Overviews. |
| PerplexityBot | Perplexity’s search crawler, which Perplexity says follows robots.txt. | Perplexity cannot index your pages to cite them. Changes can take up to a day to apply. |
Bot protection on a hosting platform or content delivery network can turn an assistant’s crawler away before robots.txt is ever read. Perplexity’s own crawler documentation tells site owners they may need to allow its bots explicitly in a web application firewall. We check the firewall rules as well as the file.
OpenAI says ChatGPT adds utm_source=chatgpt.com to the links it sends people through, so that traffic shows up in your analytics by name. Google has introduced generative AI performance reports in Search Console. We set both up in the first week, so the monthly report measures clicks, not only mentions.
The audit is where every engagement starts, and it is useful on its own even if you fix everything yourself. The right-hand column is what we need from you to finish on time.
| When | What we do | What we need from you |
|---|---|---|
| Days 1–3 | We agree the questions your buyers actually ask — by service, by town, against named competitors — and run them across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, Perplexity and Copilot, recording who is named and which sources are cited. | Twenty minutes on the questions, and the competitors you lose work to. |
| Days 3–7 | Technical checks: robots.txt and firewall rules against every crawler above, indexing, whether each key page has a quotable answer, schema, and your business facts across the directories assistants lean on. | Access to Google Search Console, Bing Webmaster Tools, your analytics and your Google Business Profile. |
| Week 2 | The prioritised list: what is stopping you being named, ordered by what it costs you and how quickly it can be fixed, with the ones you can do yourself marked. | An hour to walk through it and decide which fixes you hand to us. |
| Monthly after that | The same questions, the same assistants, the same report format, so the comparison is honest — including when something has not worked. | Nothing routine, beyond approving content changes. |
For the plain-English version of how assistants decide who to name, read how to get your business recommended by ChatGPT and what GEO actually is. If the site itself needs rebuilding so crawlers can read it, that is web development work, and if you are local, see how we work with Manchester businesses.
We run the questions your buyers actually type — best in Manchester, who does this near me, alternatives to a competitor — and record what each assistant says, who it names instead of you, and where it got that from.
Not a strategy document. A list of what is stopping you being named, ordered by how much each one costs you and how quickly it can be fixed, with the ones you can do yourself marked as such.
Content rewritten so the answer is quotable, schema corrected, crawler access unblocked, business facts made consistent everywhere an assistant might check.
Same prompts, same assistants, so the comparison is honest. You see whether you are being named more often than last month, and we say plainly when something has not worked.
Work that makes an assistant more likely to name your business when someone asks it for a recommendation. In practice that means three things: making sure your pages can actually be fetched and quoted, writing them so the answer is the first thing on the page rather than buried, and making your business facts consistent across the sources assistants check. Some people call it GEO, generative engine optimisation. It is the same job.
Traditional SEO competes for a position in a list of links, where being tenth still gets a click. An assistant names two or three firms and stops, so there is no tenth place. The technical groundwork overlaps — a site that is fast, crawlable and properly marked up helps both — but the content work is different. Search rewards a page that covers a topic thoroughly; an assistant rewards a page that answers one question in a sentence it can lift.
We run the same set of buyer questions across the same assistants every month and record what comes back: whether you were named, who was named instead, and which pages were cited. Because the prompts do not change, the month-to-month comparison is honest. You get that report whether the numbers moved or not, and we say plainly when something we tried has not worked.
Technical fixes such as crawler access and schema can be reflected within weeks, because they change what an assistant is able to read. Being named more often is slower and depends on how competitive your sector is and how established the businesses currently being named are. Anyone promising a specific position by a specific date is guessing: none of these platforms publish how they weight sources, and we will tell you what we are inferring from testing rather than presenting it as documented fact.
It should not, and the order of work is designed so it cannot. The first changes are additive — making pages fetchable, marking up facts, correcting business details across directories — none of which removes anything you currently rank for. Where we do want to rewrite a page that already earns traffic, we say so first and we change one thing at a time, so if a position moves we know what moved it. Anyone willing to rewrite your best-performing page in week one without measuring it first is guessing with your traffic.
No, and this is a fair thing to test a supplier on. The work is done on your own site and in your own directory listings, so the schema, the rewritten pages and the corrected business facts stay yours whether or not we carry on. What stops is the monthly testing and the ongoing work, not the result. Nothing is hosted by us, nothing requires a licence from us, and there is no plugin of ours to remove.
Yes. We are based in Manchester and work with businesses across the UK remotely, with on-site visits around Greater Manchester and the North West where they help. Assistant visibility is not a local problem in the way map listings are, so where you are matters far less than which questions your buyers ask.
No, and be wary of anyone who does. No assistant publishes how it chooses which businesses to name, and the answer to the same question changes from day to day. What we can do is remove the reasons you are being left out, run the same questions every month, and show you honestly whether you are named more often than before.
It depends which ones. OpenAI documents separate crawlers: OAI-SearchBot decides whether a page can appear in ChatGPT search, while GPTBot collects training data, and the two can be allowed or blocked independently. Google says Google-Extended controls training and grounding in its other AI products, not inclusion in Search, where AI Overviews draw on ordinary Googlebot crawling. Plenty of sites block the search crawlers by accident, often through a firewall rule rather than robots.txt, and vanish from the answers they wanted to be in.
Possibly, and it costs little, so we add one. But it is a proposed convention rather than something the major assistants document using, so we treat it as a small extra rather than the plan. The work that reliably matters is being crawlable, having quotable answers, and consistent facts in the places assistants check.
Every project is scoped and quoted after a free discovery call, so you get a fixed price for your situation rather than a number that assumes someone else’s. These are the shapes most engagements take.
Finding out whether AI assistants mention you, and why not.
Typical timeline: 1–2 weeks
Businesses who want to be the one an assistant recommends, not the one it skips.
Typical timeline: Ongoing, 3-month minimum
Several sites, locations or brands needing coordinated visibility.
Typical timeline: Ongoing
Timelines are typical and depend on how many systems are involved and how ready your data is. Tell us what you need and we will give you a fixed price and a date.
Compare agency scope, evidence, crawler checks and reporting before buying AI search optimisation. A practical UK brief with no guaranteed rankings.
How ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Copilot actually choose which businesses to mention, a 12-step plan a UK business can follow, prompts to test your own visibility, realistic timelines, and what an AI search agency charges in 2026.
What GEO actually is, how it differs from SEO, how assistants really retrieve and cite sources, and what it costs to get your business into AI answers.
Employing an AI engineer, bringing in a contractor and hiring an agency are three different commitments with three different risks. What changed in UK employment law in 2026, and how to decide.
Bring the questions your buyers ask. On a free thirty-minute call we will look at what the main assistants say about you today and tell you honestly whether it is worth fixing — and, if it is, give you a fixed price for the audit.
Book a Free Discovery CallReview our own live products, check our company registrations and read the commitments that shape a project. These give you concrete work and clear terms to discuss before booking a call.
Our own product
A workspace for UK legal firms connecting cited research, matter records, time recording and billing. The research workflow keeps source checking and professional review with the solicitor.
Explore WritfordOur own product
Tools for connecting shopping assistants with storefront product, cart and checkout actions. Its WordPress and storefront integrations show the kind of connected web workflows we build.
Explore Let AI BrowseRead the LetAIBrowse case studyThirty minutes, free, no obligation and no salesperson. You describe what is costing you time or customers, we ask about the systems involved, and you leave with an honest view of whether this is worth doing. We regularly end that call by saying the tool you already pay for covers it.
The code, the repository and the accounts are set up in your company name rather than ours, and they are yours on completion and full payment. Nothing runs on infrastructure we control, so ending the relationship does not end the thing we built.
Every project is quoted as a fixed price with a written scope after the call, so an over-run is our problem rather than yours. If the scope changes, we say so and re-quote before doing the work, not after.
In the UK or EU, under a data processing agreement, kept only as long as you specify. Any model provider we rely on is named as a sub-processor rather than left implicit, and we will tell you plainly where something you have asked for would put a commitment of yours at risk.
Agreed before launch rather than negotiated during an incident: what is covered, how quickly we respond, and what counts as new work. Every build has a defined escalation to a person, because the failure that costs you is the one nobody noticed.
Big Berri Limited is registered in England and Wales, company number 16562429, and registered with the Information Commissioner's Office under reference ZC119995. Both are public registers. Look us up rather than taking our word for it.